Skip to content
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ginsberg Law Social Security Disability

Ginsberg Law Offices

Free Disability Case Evaluation? Click Here

  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Mistakes to Avoid
  • About the Money
  • Medical Conditions
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Blog

Jonathan Ginsberg

Don’t Forget About the Grid Rules

By Jonathan Ginsberg on May 15, 2012

medical vocational guidelinesWhen I sit down with a new client, I always spend a little time explaining that Social Security disability is about a claimant’s capacity to perform work activity because of medical problems, and not about the medical problems themselves.   I further explain that in my experience there are three disability arguments that we can use in any case:

  1. prove that client meets a listing
  2. prove that client’s functional capacity for work has been so reduced by medical issues that he would not be a reliable worker at a simple, entry level job
  3. prove that client meets a grid rule

Most people can understand arguments #1 and #2.  The listings are essentially detailed descriptions of medical problems.  When you meet a listing, it basically means that your medical condition is so severe that Social Security assumes that you would have overwhelming work limitations.

The functional capacity argument is equally easy to understand.  Even the easiest of jobs requires you to have certain capabilities, such as sitting, standing, lifting, carrying, concentrating, behaving in an emotionally stable manner, staying at the job and not taking excessive breaks, etc.  If, for example, you do not have the capacity to sit and stand for a total of 8 hours, or if your medical problem leads to excessive breaks, then you do not have sufficient capacity to function at a job.

Pages: Page 1 Page 2

You Risk More than Addiction with Narcotic Pain Medications

By Jonathan Ginsberg on May 12, 2012

narcotic pain medication prescription problemsMany of the clients I represent take narcotic pain medications like hydrocodone, oxycontin, percocet and even methodone as a way to control pain.  I think that most people who consume narcotic pain meds to control chronic pain over months or years would agree that these medications reduce their suffering but in no way restore a true quality of life.  Narcotic pain meds usually will not control “breakthrough” pain, and all of these prescriptions produce bothersome side effects, such as lethargy, fatigue, constipation and cognitive loss (i.e., poor concentration and focus).

Unfortunately if you are not a surgical candidate for whatever reason or if you do not have the insurance coverage or finances to pursue curative therapies, long term pain management may be your only option, at least for the near term.

Now, patients who are receiving pain management have another issue to worry about.  Pharmacies, in coordination with the federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and local police departments are using computerized verification systems to cross reference prescriptions at drug stores with the DEA number assigned to physicians.

Pages: Page 1 Page 2

What Should I Know About Firing my Lawyer?

By Jonathan Ginsberg on May 3, 2012

you may pay more if your terminate your SSDI lawyerOver the past couple of years, I have noticed that more lawyers are getting into the Social Security disability business.   More specifically I am seeing TV ads and web sites for several national law firms that tout the number of cases they have handled and their promise to work hard on your behalf.

Most of these national law firms do not have offices in the Atlanta area – they process their files at their main location and they use either contract lawyers to try their cases or a lawyer will fly in a few times per month to appear at hearings.  Other national firms have a small local office to handle intake with a staff lawyer to try the cases.

I have met a number of these staff lawyers for the national firms – some seem to be quite capable and others not so much.  However most of these large firms use call centers with trained intake personnel to field phone calls from prospective clients.

My observation has been that the intake folks at some of the national law firms will say just about anything to convince a client to sign up.   More specifically, I am hearing from my own clients that the national firms are promising that they can somehow speed up the process and get to a hearing faster.

As my colleague Tomasz Stasiuk points out on his Colorado Social Security disability blog:

One thing a lawyer cannot do for you is make Social Security move faster than it wants to. No one can force SSA to make a decision before it is ready. The reason Social Security cases take so long is that there an enormous backlog of cases waiting to get through the system.

Tomasz eloquently disproves the myth that Lawyer A can get your case to a hearing faster than Lawyer B in his blog post entitled Are Lawyers Slowing Down Social Security disability cases?  I encourage you to read Tomasz’ insights.

What does this have to do with firing your lawyer? [Read more…] about What Should I Know About Firing my Lawyer?

Disability Almost Impossible to Prove Without Regular Medical Treatment and Support from Your Doctor

By Jonathan Ginsberg on April 24, 2012

medical support and SSDIThis afternoon, I received the following question by email:

I’ve applied for disability. I don’t have a lot of medical ‘backing’ as the majority of my life I haven’t had insurance, nor been able to afford it. I do have past records verifying my mental incapacities as brain damage and ADHD. My issues include arthritis in my knees and hands, back problems that are getting worse that may be contributed to RA (Havent been diagnosed with it, but it is a major hereditary problem), memory issues and concentration issues.  What are my chances of winning disability?

Here are my thoughts:  I think you will have a real uphill battle winning your Social Security disability case if you do not have medical support for your case.  I am definitely noting a trend in the cases I am trying recently – if there is not a strong medical record, judges are not going to award benefits based on  your testimony only, or on old or incomplete medical records.

Further I would say that we are getting to the point where we need a completed and supportive functional capacity form filled out by a treating doctor in the record.   [Read more…] about Disability Almost Impossible to Prove Without Regular Medical Treatment and Support from Your Doctor

Social Security Hearing Offices are Not Courts!

By Jonathan Ginsberg on April 4, 2012

Many people are surprised to learn that Social Security hearings are not held in courthouses.   This is because Social Security is an “administrative agency” not a judicial agency – in other words Social Security is part of the executive branch of government not the judicial branch.

Because of this, Social Security hearings are much more informal than what you might see at a state or federal court hearing.   Technically, when we present our case, we are making an argument to a representative of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.

There are four (4) Atlanta area hearing offices called “Offices of Disability and Review” or ODAR:

  • Downtown Atlanta
  • Atlanta North
  • Marietta
  • Covington

ODARs used to be called OHA (Office of Hearing and Appeal) but presumably some committee (maybe the same one that came

Atlanta downtown Social Security hearing office

up with the boneheaded decision to delete the judges’ names from the hearing notices) decided that the hearing offices needed a new acronym

The downtown Atlanta  ODAR is located on the 5th floor of the Marquis I Tower of the Peachtree Center Office tower.   To the right is a picture of the outside of Peachtree Center.  MARTA maintains a rail station at Peachtree Center – if you take the train, the Peachtree Center stop is “N1” – one stop north of 5 Points on the north-south line.

The Atlanta North ODAR is located at 3105 Clairmont Rd., west of the I-85/Clairmont Rd. exit.  If you take I-85, exit Clairmont Rd. and head west towards Buford Highway, and not east towards the VA Hospital.  The 3105 Building is located behind an Extended Stay Motel.

The Marietta ODAR is a video hearing only office and is located at the back of the existing Social Security office at 1415 Franklin Rd., next to a Pep Boys.

The Covington ODAR is the newest office to open.  It is located at 10155 Eagle Dr. in Covington, in a fairly new office building.  You may find that 10155 Eagle Dr. does not yet appear in the Mapquest or Yahoo Maps database and the building is set back from the street, so give yourself plenty of time to find it if you have a hearing there.

There are a number of other differences between Social Security hearing offices and judicial courts, which I will discuss in a later post but for now, just remember that when you come to your hearing, you will be looking for an office building and not a traditional courthouse.

Absurd New SSA Policy Deletes Name of Judge from Hearing Notice

By Jonathan Ginsberg on March 24, 2012

Just this past December, I wrote a post on this blog discussing the online resources available for claimants and disability lawyers to research Social Security judges assigned to their cases.  Earlier this year, SSA instituted a new policy where the identity of the judge is hidden to claimants and lawyers until the day of your hearing.

The stated reason for this new policy is supposed abuse by some lawyers who were advising their clients to dismiss cases and move to a different jurisdiction when certain judges were assigned.  In order to stop this “judge shopping” the identity of the judge is kept secret.

I find this new policy asinine for any number of reasons.  First, as a claimant’s representative I have an affirmative duty to prepare my clients for their hearings.  A big part of preparing for hearings involves preparing for the judge assigned to one’s case.

  • Some judges ask a lot of questions, some judges ask almost no questions.
  • Some judges go out of their way to make claimants comfortable while others take on the role of an advocate for Social Security and challenge the claimant.
  • Some judges always use vocational expert witnesses and others do not

I have no particular issue with any of these approaches but I do have a problem not being able to prepare my client about what to expect.  From my client’s perspective, they have likely never been in front of a Social Security judge and they will be nervous.  Why not enhance the chances that a judge can get accurate and thoughtful information instead of playing silly games because a few lawyers somewhere advised their clients to delay the adjudication of their cases because of a particular judge. [Read more…] about Absurd New SSA Policy Deletes Name of Judge from Hearing Notice

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search Our Site

Jonathan Ginsberg

Jonathan Ginsberg

Contact Me

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Are you currently represented?
Ginsberg Law Offices
1854 Independence Square
Atlanta, Georgia 30338-5174

P: 770-393-4985
F: 770-393-0240
E: ginsberg@gmail.com

Jonathan’s AVVO Rating

Lawyer Jonathan Ginsberg | Top Attorney Social Security

Free Georgia Social Security Disability Case Review

Click Here

  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 · Smart Passive Income Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in